Age, ID and financial verification
Remote licences are, in fact, a legal requirement for any business, wherever located, to offer facilities for gambling to British residents. Points to note are that land-based casino licences are not freely available and the rollout of major casino resorts envisaged when the legislation was passed has generally not occurred. The Gambling Act 2005 provides for a range of licences to be granted to both non-remote (i.e., land-based) as well as remote businesses. There is extensive gambling regulation in Great Britain, mostly imposed upon licensees by the various conditions and codes of practice attached to their gambling licences, which are colloquially referred to as the “Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice” or “LCCP”.
Playzee
Therefore, under Option 1, we believe there is significant potential for operators to offer predominantly Category B cabinets while meeting their Category C and D ratio through in-fills and tablets. This is a necessary objective to help mitigate against gambling-related harm. We are particularly concerned that Option 1 may encourage new operators to enter the market with the specific intention of maximising their Category B cabinet offer in this way. Therefore, some respondents argued that Option 3 would be the most sensible long-term approach for securing safer gambling functionality and messaging across these venues. However, overall almost half of respondents from the arcade and bingo sector acknowledged that Option 3 posed a risk of increasing gambling-related harm. There was a general consensus across respondents that Option 3 presented the greatest risk of increasing rates of gambling-related harm.
- For instance, QuickBet, Funky Jackpot, and HotWins Casino will offer you top-notch mobile casino experience in the UK.
- However, at this stage we do not know precisely what these costs will be, as we do not have any evidence on how casinos will respond to this.
- Since 1 May 2025, operators have only been allowed to directly market to customers that have consented to marketing on a granular per product (i.e., casino, bingo, betting) and per channel (i.e., SMS, email) basis and, in January 2026, further rules will take effect on the offer of incentives.
In order to ensure local authorities can continue to carry out their licensing and enforcement duties effectively, we are proposing to raise this cap by either 10%, 20% or 30%. This included a number of measures to adjust outdated regulatory restrictions applying to the land-based gambling sector. The Gambling Act Review white paper published in April 2023 set out the government’s plans for modernising the regulation of gambling in Great Britain. This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.
We propose that the default limits for B1 machines are aligned to those machines in arcades, bingo halls and betting premises. The government proposes that mandatory limits must be included on gaming machines accepting cashless forms of payments. The government proposes that gaming machines accepting direct debit payments must allow customers to set time and monetary thresholds. The government proposes that the current deposit and committed payment limits should apply to direct cashless payments on gaming machines.
Arcades licence activities
This includes online casinos, sports betting sites, bingo operators and land-based gambling premises. We do not see this as being an issue for operators or manufacturers as it is already widely available on Category B gaming machines within all land-based gambling premises. Very few responses were received by operators who hold more than one premises licence at the same location, but the majority of these indicated that they would not look to take up the maximum entitlement non gamestop casino of 80 machines per licence were it to be an option.


A flat additional annual fee of £3,750 is payable for a licence that combines two of game host (casino), game host (bingo) and betting host (virtual events only). A flat additional application fee of £1,570 is payable for a licence that combines two of game host (casino), game host (bingo) and betting host (virtual events only). A flat additional application fee of £1,256 is payable for a licence that combines two of game host (casino), game host (bingo) and betting host (virtual events only). Some gambling software businesses provide facilities for remote gambling by making their games available to customers of other operators. Online.casino, or O.C, is an international guide to gambling, providing the latest news, game guides and honest online casino reviews conducted by real experts. One of the main benefits of a national gambling licensing system is that it can help casino customers regulate their gambling within the system.
We believe this is particularly important within the wider context of the modernising measures we are taking to support land-based gambling operators. Premises licence fees in Scotland are set under different regulations and are therefore a matter of consideration for the Scottish Government. We believe that on balance an increase to the maximum cap on premises licence fees by 15% is proportionate.

Typically, the casino will match your deposit by a certain percentage up to a set amount. These are some of the best casino bonuses in the UK for their size. You can claim deposit bonuses on sign-up or when you reload your casino account. In the subsequent sections, you’ll learn about the common bonus types available at casino platforms. Whichever casino you choose to play at, you’ll definitely find games from top developers like Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, Play’n GO, and Big Time Gaming. It’s not the same as a land-based casino, but with HD live streaming and real professional dealers, that’s the closest experience you can get.
The government will introduce regulations through a draft affirmative statutory instrument to ensure that, for every 2 Category B gaming machines sited in AGC or bingo premises, at least one Category C or D gaming machine of a similar size is also sited on the premises. Both policy options are variations of Option 2, meaning that they focus on addressing the practice of operators siting increased numbers of Category B cabinet gaming machines by making lower staking Category C and D content available on in-fill and tablet gaming machines. A substantial number of responses drew upon the higher levels of customer spend which is evidenced on Category B gaming machines by comparison to Category C and D gaming machines, particularly as this relates to potential indicators of gambling-related harm.

Similarly, a centrally co-ordinated self-exclusion database (“GAMSTOP”) also allows customers to self-exclude from remote gambling offered by operators licensed by the Gambling Commission. Hence, the typical remote gambling business will require three types of British licence to lawfully offer remote gambling to British residents – an “operating” licence, a software “operating” licence and a suite of personal licences for its main personnel. Suppliers of gambling machines made available for use in land-based environments similarly need to obtain their own licence. This so-called “point-of-supply” legislative scheme was reversed (in the case of remote gambling) by the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014, which converted the British system into a so-called “point-of-consumption” regime, which criminalised any person in any jurisdiction who makes available facilities for gambling to British players on a remote basis without British licences. In addition, alcohol licenses premises can apply for a gaming machine permit for additional machines.
If No is selected What do you think the maximum committed payment limit should be for the following machine categories (£)? Shown if No is selected What do you think the maximum deposit limit should be for the following machine categories (£)? (Optional response)Sliding scale (Mandatory response)£20 / £50 / £100 / No Limit / Other / I don’t know The current maximum amount of cash that can be inserted into a machine at one time is £50 as this is the highest denomination of bank note. Regulation 7 ensures that there is a maximum value that players can deposit onto a machine in a single action.
This measure will also bring greater consistency to the different licensing regimes and greater parity between online and land-based casinos. These products do not count as gaming machines, but neither do they provide any of the benefits of a multiplayer table in contributing to a balanced mix or affording opportunities for social interaction. However, it is our intention to apply a fixed maximum of 80 gaming machines per physical location.
These UK casino regulations allow larger venues to diversify offerings but require careful compliance to avoid penalties. These responsible gambling measures require operators to update systems and inform players, ensuring compliance by mid-2025. Gaming machine rules are also shifting, impacting casino operations.
Senior commission staff review the complete assessment. Pay initial application fee (£2,590 for most remote licenses). For more context on jurisdictional costs, see our licensing cost breakdown. Smart operators spend 3-6 months preparing before submission. Most operators need multiple licenses. Market access to 40+ million adults with legal gambling spend exceeding £14.2 billion annually.
The government proposes that a new regime will apply to 1968 Act casinos that seek to increase their gaming machine entitlement. There were mixed views on casinos’ ability to hold multiple licences at the same physical location. It was proposed that the requirements would form part of a new regime that operators would have the option of moving onto, taking up a new gaming machine entitlement under the new rules.
To be allowed 80 machines, its non-gambling area would have to be at least 250sqm. For example, a casino could have a gambling area of 500sqm, a table gaming area of 250sqm and a non-gambling area of 230sqm. However, 2005 Act casinos are currently allowed to offer betting and we are not aware of any issues that this has created. We intend on keeping the same requirements for calculating non-gambling areas for both 2005 Act and 1968 Act casinos. However, if a casino has 600sqm of gambling space, it would only be required to have at least 250sqm of table gaming space.

Plus, you’ll get access to ample responsible gambling tools to keep your gaming habits under control. Whatever your answer is, you should always choose British gambling sites running under a valid licence from the UKGC. Almost all UK casinos offer top-notch desktop sites you can access through your browser.
Under the sliding scale proposal (Fig 3), this casino would only be entitled to 70 machines due to the size of its non-gambling area in this instance. While the gambling and table gaming area requirements would be enough for an entitlement of 80 machines, its non-gambling area is too small to qualify for this entitlement. We are also open to any other proposals for how table gaming areas should be calculated for 1968 Act casinos which trigger their enhanced gaming machine entitlements. We propose that the table gaming area for casinos that have less than 500sqm of gambling space must be equal to or greater than half the size of the gambling area.
In practice, this means that 2 Category B gaming machines on a cabinet device type can be made available to a minimum of one Category C or D gaming machine on a cabinet device type. This measure will apply on a device type basis, meaning that the ratio applies across the 3 different types of device on which gaming machines content is currently offered in arcades and bingo halls, namely cabinets, in-fills and tablets. Introducing an age-limit on certain types of Category D gaming machines – draft affirmative statutory instrument.
We think that the requirements of account verification, transaction limit, and deposit limits, alongside a minimum transaction time will provide appropriate safeguards for these lower stake machines. We do not propose that Category D machines are required to allow customers to set time and monetary thresholds in order to accept direct debit card payments. The pub sector argued that it would be disproportionate, cost-prohibitive and unlikely to be achievable on these types of machines.